On Being Kane.

Yesterday someone going by the name of Kane left a comment basically inciting violence against the people currently in power.

I don’t know Kane but when I told him I didn’t think his name was Kane he changed his moniker to “Kane is my name, take it up with my mother” effectively revoking his permit to comment on this blog. I have decided to leave it that way. I suggest to “Kane is my name, take it up with my mother” that he starts a blog on his own were he can write whatever the hell he wants and if he gets enough supporters to do whatever the hell he wants.

I am most definitely not in favour of violent resistance. I hope that with enough people awake we will be able to avoid violence. We all know that violence is not the answer and that violence most often serves the ruling elite not us. A violent revolution is a loss to all of us and if it happens, it will not be because I promote it.

Does that make me a coward? I don’t know. I don’t think Gandhi was a coward. I don’t think Martin Luther King was a coward. But as Martin Luther King said: “Darkness is not driven out by darkness. Only light can drive out darkness. Hate can not drive out hate. Only love can do that.”

Peace to you all and may we become the light that shines in the darkest corners. May we become the Love that destroys all hatred. Do not let the abyss stare into you while you shine a light into it.

Ev

Advertisements

14 thoughts on “On Being Kane.

  1. Interestingly the beliefs/rules of Islam were set up by the Empire for control of the people of that nation. SA has a police state, their own religious police state.
    I am skeptical of anyone promoting a set of beliefs (such as the label Islam/ Christianity) written by the elite rulers that say “God says”.
    Especially as it is used it for wars, conflicts, divide and conquer.
    It is a shame people can be tricked into identifying with a label such as ” Islamic” ” Christian” .Then their belief system can be used to create chaos when their fellow man who is not indoctrinated into thinking they are ” Islamic” or “christian” becomes ” the other”.

  2. I believe people who incite people to “attack ” are either ignorant or paid shills.

    As EV said awareness is needed .

    Not the spreading msm Islamaphobia, pro Russia China, US vilification or ignorance of the central banking system and who funds and profits off the wars.

  3. Instead of attacking the head of the Beast, which is well-equipped with fangs, I think we should go for its vulnerable tail. One of the basic problems, in my opinion, is the denomination of oil sales in dollars, i.e. “petrodollars”, which are eventually recycled back to the US in return for prodigious quantities of weapons – virtually the only things the US makes these days. Many of these weapons, if they are not simply parked in the desert of “Saudi” Arabia, are then used to terrorize populations and destroy countries. (The Saudis and Qataris are, indirectly, the principal sponsors of Islamic State and other terrorist organizations.) So real change could be achieved by working for the denomination of oil sales in currencies other than the dollar, in line with moves already being made by China, Russia and Iran. At the same time, perhaps, the Saudi princes and sundry Gulf potentates could be persuaded to retire, en masse, to the casinos of Monaco.

    • That sounds exactly like what the Washington War machine does .

      The world bank funds the wars and fights terrorism with terrorism -profiting off it.
      The pointed out fact that “attacking” or using violence to stop violence is not effective was lost on you Alan?

      The Crown, Vatican and Washington set the price of oil and how oil is paid for.The Crown set up the Islamic State .”The Saudi Kingdom and the Crown Empire are one and the same institution— one extended Establishment of ruling elites.
      “Contrary to popular opinion, the Crown Empire does still exist. In many respects, it is more global, more powerful, and more vicious than during its heyday in the 18th and 19th centuries. Moreover, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, which was effectively created by the Crown Empire between 1901 and 1932, is a critical extension of that Empire. Abdulaziz ibn Saud, who became Saudi monarch in 1932, was on the British payroll for more than a decade. For the last three decades, the member of the British Royal Family who has been Empress Elizabeth II’s chief executive officer, working directly with the Saudi royal household, and with the key Saudi personalities implicated in creating al-Qaeda and in supporting 9/11, has been Prince Charles” http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2014/4121charles_arabia.html

      • No, the “pointed out fact that ‘attacking’ or using violence to stop violence is not effective” was not lost on me. I made the same point myself, in another post on this website, when I wrote: “A frontal assault on the empire wouldn’t work anyway, and would actually play into its hands. There’s nothing the empire likes more than chaos and violence, which allow it to remain relevant and in control.” I do not advocate “attacking” in the above post, which opens with what, I imagined, would be seen by everyone as an attempt at humor.

        The main problem I have with the material you have referenced is that it (apparently) accepts the official narrative of 9/11, which I don’t – for a host of reasons. For a start, we have the testimony of Stanley Hilton that 9/11 scenarios were canvassed in the philosophy classes of Leo Strauss in the 1960s. The following is from http://www.911hardfacts.com/report_04.htm:

        “Another alarming coincidence surrounding PNAC [Project for the New American Century] and September 11 has been revealed by attorney Stanley Hilton. Hilton, a graduate of Harvard Law School and former senior advisor and lead counsel for Bob Dole, attended the University of Chicago as an undergraduate in the 1960s. He studied under the infamous Leo Strauss, considered by many the father of neo-conservatism. Fellow students and acquaintances of Hilton’s at the time included Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Perle. In an interview with journalist Alex Jones, Hilton reports that, under the supervision of Strauss, his senior thesis detailed a plan to establish a Presidential Dictatorship using a fabricated ‘Pearl Harbor-like incident’ as justification. He further states that he, Perle, Wolfowitz, and other students of Strauss discussed an array of different plots and incidents ‘like September 11th’ and ‘flying airplanes into buildings way back in the 60s’.

        There were many actors involved in the drama of 9/11, not least of them the Mossad. And there are so many anomalies in the official narrative, one could never list them all here. Suffice it to say that none of the major events of that day can have occurred in the manner described in the 9/11 Commission Report, which appears to be the work of scriptwriter Philip Zelikow.

        • I must have misinterpreted the word you used ” attack” and I disagree with your economic theory and ideas about China and Russia(the imagined exclusion of these nations from the Empire) so of course I did not get your humor.

          For what is there to attack that would benefit humanity?
          As you do not control the price fixed commodities, dollar, oil or their market suggesting market manipulations is futile.
          Far better to show people that the market and system is totally
          rigged and how the system works so that they can withdraw their current support.

          An ignorant man working for the empire does not even know he has had been subjected to a lifelong process of mind programming.
          The battle with the empire needs to be won on a higher plane.

          You are incorrect I did not and do accept the us govt/msm narrative of 9/11.The quote/link of the Crown establishing the Islamic state for Crown control ( Rivera says its the Vatican)was to point our and show the Crown( world bank) funds terrorism and not “the Saudis and Qataris” .
          Your govt has sent troops to terrorize the middle east and yet can we say NZ fund terrorism?
          Yes and no, this act of terrorism is paid for using debt borrowed in the people of NZ name but it is done fraudulently to protect the Crown’s interests. I would say it is not one nation that funds terrorism but the Empire that puts nations in debt to terrorize the people and maintain control of regions.
          The Crown, Vatican and Washington are the “Empire”

          • I mentioned no economic “theory”. I said that China and Russia are now denominating oil sales in currencies other than the US dollar. That’s fact, not theory. And it’s also fact, not theory, that this move – and others like it – threaten the role of the US dollar as the world’s reserve currency. Understanding this, and what it implies for the future of US power, is not rocket science.

            “You are incorrect I did not and do accept the us govt/msm narrative of 9/11…”

            I said nothing about your views. I explicitly referred to the material you referenced.

Leave a Reply to John L Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s