No Insurance Cover For Nuclear Damage From Now On

Insurance Companies in the United States have begun notifying customers they will no longer have ANY coverage whatsoever for anything relating to nuclear energy claims.  Fallout, radiation sickness, property damage from radiation – all EXCLUDED. According to Turner Radio Network.

This begs the question:  If the nuclear disaster at the Fukushima power plant in Japan is as harmless to Americans as the government and “scientists” are telling us, why are Insurance companies specifically EXCLUDING coverage for nuclear energy related claims?  (Hint: The government is lying about the danger.)

TRN has a PDF of one such notice being sent by Traveler’s Insurance Company.  You can read it for yourself below.


Letters being sent by U.S. Insurance companies are notifying policy holders of an important change to their coverage.  Letter sent by one major insurance company read as follows:


Dear Policyholder;
Thank you for choosing Travelers. We are providing advance notice of changes affecting your renewal policy or notification of renewal premium. Please consult Travelers Service Center for guidance in reviewing the information contained in this notice.

Your renewal policy will provide changes in coverage because of underwriting judgment based on an evaluation of your
individual risk exposures and/or loss history.

The following is changed on your renewal:
Coverage Change Details

The accompanying  paperwork gets very specific about what they mean.  It says, in part:

 1. The insurance does not apply:

A. Under any Liability Coverage, to “bodily injury” or “property damage”:

B. Under any Medical Payments coverage, to expenses incurred with respect to “bodily injury” resulting from the “hazardous properties” of “nuclear material” and arising out of the operation of a “nuclear facility” by any person or organization.

2. As used in this endorsement:

“Hazardous properties” includes radioactive, toxic or explosive properties. “Nuclear material” means “source material”, “special nuclear material” or “by-product material”  . . . . Spent fuel . . . . Waste . . . . .

The letters further make clear:

“Property damage” includes all forms of radioactive contamination of property.”

That last item, about radioactive contamination of property,  THAT’s the “biggie.”  THAT is the issue that will shortly become evident to people who live on the west coast of north America.  One day, when folks in places like San Francisco, Los Angeles, and San Diego wake up and hear  evacuation orders on radio and TV telling them to run for their lives because the radiation levels from the Pacific Ocean have made their homes uninhabitable, THEN all those folks will understand the implications of this nasty little change in Insurance coverage.

The Turner Radio Network has been warning people about the coming radiation from Fukushima.  For months, we have been issuing radiation alerts when local background radiation levels start “spiking.”  For months, we have been closely monitoring developments at the Fukushima disaster site and publishing news stories about those developments and the dangers they pose to North America.

Sadly, for months, critics have claimed our coverage was “sensationalism” or “designed to scare people.”  That was never the case, but it didn’t stop the critics from claiming such.

Read more

One thought on “No Insurance Cover For Nuclear Damage From Now On

  1. Thank you, thank you very much friends, I’am really happy to follow your blog. I’m still finding out more and thank you are an awesome blogger, and Inspiring Hope you inspire more readers basically very ok. greetings from Gede Prama 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s