6 thoughts on “Owning the weather in 2025

  1. Lord Christopher Monckton, chief policy advisor to the Science and Public Policy Institute and former science advisor to Margaret Thatcher, tells The New American from Rio that the just-concluded Rio+20 conference was not about saving the planet or eradicating poverty, but about shackling the plant under global government. He also optimistically stresses that the “pointy heads here in Rio” have failed despite their declaration of success and that “the game is up.” Video produced by http://www.libertynewsnetwork.tv

  2. An extract from my teenagers latest school project on this subject and thank you for your support on this day.

    Why are they Spraying and Without the Consent or Knowledge of the General Public?

    It is being used as weather modification technology. The government and media will soon be forced to tell you, they are using the Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering to combat global warming, now known as climate change. They have been spraying more than 20 years over the United States, so they have been forced into making this claim because the people are waking up and demanding answers. We will be told that it is being used to cool the planet. This is recent from the BBC after years of ridiculing the questions from the public about SAG. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8338853.stm

    There is a research paper titled Owning the Weather by 2025. http://csat.au.af.mil/2025/volume3/vol3ch15.pdf

    Quote from the document: “It is a study designed to comply with a directive from the chief of staff of the Air Force to examine the concepts, capabilities, and technologies the United States will require remaining the dominant air and space force in the future. Presented on 17 June 1996, this report was produced in the Department of Defense school environment of academic freedom and in the interest of advancing concepts related to national defense.”
    Further on into that document they name the following uses for the technology:
    • Artificial Weather
    • Precipitation Modification
    • Fog and Cloud Modification
    • Storm Modification
    • Counter Weather
    • Space Weather-modification

    They have admitted using this process in the Vietnam War as a weapon. They flooded areas to flush the ‘enemy’ out. The technology also can create drought.

    Together with the High Active Auroral Research Project (HAARP), this technology can be used for tectonic warfare. I won’t go into HAARP (used for ionospheric heating mentioned in Owning the Weather by 2025) because that is a story for another day but there are two links here for the documentaries “Angels Don’t Play this HAARP” http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2804238542173218531 and “Angels Still Don’t Play this HAARP” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLZcaItj70U

    Geoengineering is also used by oil industry for seismic mapping. The problem with this is that they are not just x-raying the land and seabed, but they are also x-raying everything and everyone.

    The main stream media have started talking about military chaff in the air. It is used to jam radar according to this weather man. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ovE-3o5ySMY&feature=player_embedded

    Who is Paying for these Spray Programmes?
    Three words, Carbon Tax Credits.

    • drought conditions in the Murray River basin, (Australia’s most important farming area) have been associated with chemtrail activity in the face of approaching rain events, with the commodification of water, and with the consolidation of corporate farms, which, very strangely, have been planting water-hungry crops like cotton. They have been bad neighbours to small farmers around them, and have bought up small neighbouring farms for a song when their owners have been forced to sell, or just walk away. So if it is true that chemtrails have played a part in this landgrab, why should we believe the line that the wealth-maggots are worried about global warming? They don’t flinch from spreading depleted uranium or murdering children in their millions with sanctions. Maybe they care about their waterfront property in New York, but apparently that is expendable too. I think they are driven to try and control the whole earth, because they are small-minded and mean-spirited. They need to spend time growing vegetables. We don’t need their aeroplanes anyway. Big sailing ships are a better idea.

      • Hi Steve. Agenda 21 certainly is in full swing in Australia.
        I don’t know if you have seen these clips or not but OZ is being forced to admit to its efforts to save us from ‘global warming – climate change, or what ever media speak they are pushing now.
        When viewing these people – rememer the floods that hit Australia last year.
        The technology is totallyw watered down (scuse pun) in these clips but you get the idea.
        Thanks to Uncle Rupert 🙂

        Speaking of uranium, it is interesting that Sydney has the highest radiation reading on the planet according to the radiation network.
        quote: The station is near sea level, so its average reading seems high at 50 CPM (as of 5/21/12). The station operator suggests there is a lot of stone around which may be slightly radioactive, and he will be trying out different locations.
        interestingly after the Melbourne quake I watched the level rise to 57 in Sydney the following day. Did the rocks have babies?

        • That radiation monitoring network is a good idea. The Australian info is not even the bare bones just yet, though. The roads in and around Darwin were made with radioactive rock. Those fluctuations associated with earthquakes are interesting. But you can see that the picture has to be put together from vastly more data collection, and supported with a sophisticated model. There may be radiation coming from our atmosphere, from the sun, from our galaxy’s centre. Different kinds (wavelengths) of radiation are sure to present varying problems for us.
          We lived between the north and south air corridors about halfway between Sydney and Melbourne in northeast Victoria four four years. Roughly during years 6 to 10 of a 12 year drought. We saw chemtrails laid out in carefully calculated parallel lines, moreso when they were seriously effective at turning a clear sky milky and oily. We saw a dozen times, planes in inexplicable holding patterns, sometimes flying extraordinarily low, spewing fluff. We saw some airlines (qantas and virgin) chemming when other airlines had contrails or none in the same sky. We observed that our area got mores intense

          • more intense treatment (sorry, my phone is my pc, it is slightly problematic with its baby screen) than areas to the north and south. Our place was where the air corridor for planes intersected the Murray river. It was apparent to us after years of correlating chemtrail activity with the behaviour of rainbearing weather events observed on the excellent BOM radar, that a sustained effort was being made to prevent the fall of rain in the headwaters of the Murray.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s