|
As seen in this revealing photo the Twin Towers' destruction exhibited all the characteristics of destruction by explosions:
|
| 1. |
Extremely rapid onset of “collapse”
|
| 2. |
Sounds of explosions at plane impact zone — a full second prior to collapse (heard by 118 first responders as well as by media reporters)
|
| 3. |
Observations of flashes (seen by numerous professionals)
|
| 4. |
Squibs, or “mistimed” explosions, 40 floors below the “collapsing” building seen in all the videos
|
| 5. |
Mid-air pulverization of all the 90,000 tons of concrete and steel decking, filing cabinets & 1000 people – mostly to dust
|
| 6. |
Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic dust clouds
|
| 7. |
Vertical progression of full building perimeter demolition waves
|
| 8. |
Symmetrical collapse – through the path of greatest resistance – at free-fall speed — the columns gave no resistance
|
| 9. |
1,400 foot diameter field of equally distributed debris – outside of building footprint
|
| 10. |
Blast waves blew out windows in buildings 400 feet away
|
| 11. |
Lateral ejection of thousands of individual 20 - 50 ton steel beams up to 500 feet
|
| 12. |
Total destruction of the building down to individual structural steel elements – obliterating the steel core structure.
|
| 13. |
Tons of molten Metal found by FDNY under all 3 high-rises (no other possible source other than an incendiary cutting charge such as Thermate)
|
| 14. |
Chemical signature of Thermate (high tech incendiary) found in slag, solidified molten metal, and dust samples by Physics professor Steven Jones, PhD.
|
| 15. |
FEMA finds rapid oxidation and intergranular melting on structural steel samples
|
| 16. |
More than 1000 Bodies are unaccounted for — 700 tiny bone fragments found on top of nearby buildings
|
|
And exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire, i.e.
|
| 1. |
Slow onset with large visible deformations
|
| 2. |
Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, intact, from the point of plane impact, to the side most damaged by the fires)
|
| 3. |
Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel
|
| 4. |
High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never “collapsed”
|
Why does Mick think this cartoon is funny given the subject of the article?
Because anyone with a modicum of understanding of Nuclear weapons manufacture knows that Netanyahu’s explanation of Iran’s “enrichment progress” is laughable …Wiley E Coyote and Netanyahu have that in common. The Amce bomb cartoon was childish in the extreme and Netanyahu is a known liar.
Fact :Iran has been able to process and enrich Uranium to 20% as is required for medical uses…to produce a nuclear weapon you need a minimum enrichment of >93% .Therefore if you have one million ton of 20% enriched Uranium you cannot make a single nuclear bomb …not one ,if you have as little as 16Kgs of 95% enriched Uranium you have the beginnings of a nuclear bomb .Volume of less than 93% means nothing .
You would think that Bibi would be quite knowledgeable on the requirements of making a nuclear weapons as Israel made their first one in the 60′s and some say they have more than 200 functioning warheads today…some in their submarines even. Now I have a real problem with a nation that has Israels history of violence having a single Nuclear weapons ! I think Israel should be sanctioned until they open their Nuclear Facilities ti IAEA inspections and until they do America (based on its own laws) should stop all aid to Israel ,both Military and financial.
Hypocrisy or humour ,take your pick .
Thanks for the reply. Yes, agree completely about Israel, or more specifically, Zionist Israel. I just didn’t see the humour when there is a potential nuclear calamity waiting in the wings.
How about truth telling. No one ever talks about the 200 odd nuke this crazy bastard has at his disposal while Iran has none. Psychologists would describe Netanyahus’ behaviour as ‘guilt projection’.
moooooooooooo moooooooooooo mooooooooooo and moo
And another verbally impaired commentator on a short visit from the Standard where he usually resides!
It was like watching Wile E Coyote with his AMCE Bomb !
good post Mick
One blatant lie, in his speech (which the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, (once proudly objective until John Howard strangled it into submission,) treated to exaggerated prominence) was the suggestion that the USA (inc) could have stopped Saddam from invading Kuwait, had they “drawn a red line”. Well, everyone who is not on their knees in front of their 5764inch LCD television set knows, the American administration gave Saddam the green light to invade, the responded with orchestrated atrocities that are still ongoing. Netenyahu also knows this well, because in those days the Israeli hawks had a lot of traction in the Pentagon, and doubtless contributed to the treachery and the laying waste of Iraq.