|
As seen in this revealing photo the Twin Towers' destruction exhibited all the characteristics of destruction by explosions:
|
| 1. |
Extremely rapid onset of “collapse”
|
| 2. |
Sounds of explosions at plane impact zone — a full second prior to collapse (heard by 118 first responders as well as by media reporters)
|
| 3. |
Observations of flashes (seen by numerous professionals)
|
| 4. |
Squibs, or “mistimed” explosions, 40 floors below the “collapsing” building seen in all the videos
|
| 5. |
Mid-air pulverization of all the 90,000 tons of concrete and steel decking, filing cabinets & 1000 people – mostly to dust
|
| 6. |
Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic dust clouds
|
| 7. |
Vertical progression of full building perimeter demolition waves
|
| 8. |
Symmetrical collapse – through the path of greatest resistance – at free-fall speed — the columns gave no resistance
|
| 9. |
1,400 foot diameter field of equally distributed debris – outside of building footprint
|
| 10. |
Blast waves blew out windows in buildings 400 feet away
|
| 11. |
Lateral ejection of thousands of individual 20 - 50 ton steel beams up to 500 feet
|
| 12. |
Total destruction of the building down to individual structural steel elements – obliterating the steel core structure.
|
| 13. |
Tons of molten Metal found by FDNY under all 3 high-rises (no other possible source other than an incendiary cutting charge such as Thermate)
|
| 14. |
Chemical signature of Thermate (high tech incendiary) found in slag, solidified molten metal, and dust samples by Physics professor Steven Jones, PhD.
|
| 15. |
FEMA finds rapid oxidation and intergranular melting on structural steel samples
|
| 16. |
More than 1000 Bodies are unaccounted for — 700 tiny bone fragments found on top of nearby buildings
|
|
And exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire, i.e.
|
| 1. |
Slow onset with large visible deformations
|
| 2. |
Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, intact, from the point of plane impact, to the side most damaged by the fires)
|
| 3. |
Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel
|
| 4. |
High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never “collapsed”
|
perhaps there is a large company wanting to market un certified foods .like Ge or gm foods or want to market less than healthy foods for great profit.The WTO who are they and who runs it .What can members collect in their pockets by siding with these companies.Which country do they operate out of ?Do they supply every country with there rules if so do the citizens see them openly.If not each countries people should demand it of their representatives, so we can demand packaging descriptions of every thing we eat.
…
Here’s some links to Global Trade Watch, for those of us who loath sitting through the corporate non-excellence that is New Zealand internet … click … wait … wait … oh! You Tube! … wait .. wait … watch the little loading thing go round and round … yay! it’s starting! … oh … stopped … wait … wait … round and round …
Nek minnit, found this on the interwebbys >
“Todd Tucker, Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch joins Thom Hartmann.”
“Put down that fork! Do you now what’s REALLY on your dinner plate? Well – it’s becoming increasingly difficult for you to find out and there may be very little our lawmakers can do about it. Do you know what’s in your dinner? Chances are…you probably don’t. That’s because recent rulings by the World Trade Organization have made it harder and harder for Americans to know if what they’re eating is safe – and exactly where it came from. For example – last month – the the WTO struck down a law passed by Congress and signed by the President in 2008 had required labels on all meat so that we know what country the cattle was born, raised, and slaughtered in. Think about that for a second – laws passed by our elected Representatives are being struck down by foreign bureaucrats and corporations through the World Trade Organization. Also this year – the WTO struck down dolphin-safe tuna labels – arguing that it would do economic harm to foreign fishing fleets that slaughter dolphins in the process of catching tuna. So why is this? Why is it suddenly illegal for us to know more about what’s in the food we eat? And why are we as a nation bending at the will of the WTO? ”
from > http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017839
ALSO
Todd Tucker > http://www.citizen.org/Page.aspx?pid=2568
GTW blog > http://citizen.typepad.com/eyesontrade/