On silver iodide, weather modification and butterflies also known as the best weather money can buy.

Update: I was asked if I could link to the information about the volcano emitting more CO2 in 4 days than human kind in five years. This is incorrect. I meant to say this:

It appears that the Chilean Volcano barfed more CO2 into the atmosphere than needed to negate the entire attempt of mankind to reduce carbon exhaust in the last five years so what are we going to do?

As I clearly states It appears that way. I am not a scientist and I feel therefore not entitled to make statements as facts in the matter. I am however critical of the Climate change doctrine as I explain below.

—————————————————–

Yesterday for the first time a discussion erupted on weather modification on the Standard. What’s more it was the first time I came out there as a climate change sceptic. That doesn’t mean I don’t think that we don’t have huge problems with pollution, destruction of precious habitats and other assorted and despicable acts of disrespect for the planet we call our home but I don’t think that Carbon pollution is one of them and I don’t think that paying taxes to rich pricks is the solution even if Carbon was  problem.

(Original text corrected above) For example it appears that the eruption of the Chilean Volcano barfed more CO2 into the atmosphere to negate the entire attempt of man kind in the last five years so what are we going to do? Extract huge amounts of money from the Chilean people for allowing the volcano to erupt?

My prime beef with the whole climate change debate is that the real issues are being obscured by technology that quite understandably is not something the people who apply it are willing to talk about in great detail. This technology is called weather modification. One of the techniques to modify weather with is called cloud seeding. Cloud seeding shows up as trails in the sky and to separate them from from the Contrails or condensation trails which are vapour trails or artificial clouds that are the visible trails of condensed water vapour made by the exhaust of aircraft engines people have taken to naming them Chemtrails or Chemical trails.

Whenever you talk about these “chemtrails” people tend to go a bit funny and gigly and they look at you with the stare they save for people they consider to be cooks so so if and when a pilot is willing to admit in an interview that he actually partakes in the activity called cloud seeding that is big news. So here is a video recording of the voice of a gentleman who talks freely about his endeavours as a cloud seeding pilot.

For those of you who think that silver iodide is a harmless substance here is the wiki entry on it. Is Weather Modification. Inc. the only company willing to seed our atmosphere with toxins to please people with enough money with the weather they would like to see above their little patch? Well here is an image of the known weather modification companies in the West of the US and Canada.

http://thestandard.org.nz/its-begun/#comments

 

 

About these ads

11 thoughts on “On silver iodide, weather modification and butterflies also known as the best weather money can buy.

  1. the Chilean Volcano barfed more CO2 into the atmosphere than needed to negate the entire attempt of mankind to reduce carbon exhaust in the last five years so what are we going to do?

    Considering that anthropogenic CO2 levels haven’t actually dropped at all over the last five years (and have actually increased) this isn’t really saying all that much. A bit like saying that you’ve tried to save $100 over the last five years, are actually $5 in debt, and then someone comes along and steals another $1 from you.

    http://www.environmental-expert.com/news/record-greenhouse-gas-levels-see-for-yourself-243472

    Plimer also states this…

    I don’t really want to rain on your parade too much, but I should mention that when the volcano Mt Pinatubo erupted in the Philippines in 1991, it spewed out more greenhouse gases into the atmosphere than the entire human race had emitted in all its years on earth.

    Which is just plain wrong, and re-iterating a falsehood originally made by right-wing commentator Rush Limbaugh. And he wasn’t even talking about climate change, but ozone depletion. See…

    http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1895
    http://bit.ly/kjASPK

  2. What James asked.

    Could you please provide a source for your statement that the eruption of the Chile volcano has expelled more carbon dioxide than man has in the last 5 years.

    • Thanks for pointing out an error. What I intended to say was that it appears that the Chilean Volcano barfed more CO2 into the atmosphere than needed to negate the entire attempt of mankind to reduce carbon exhaust in the last five years so what are we going to do?

      So I did not say that the volcano produced more CO2 in 4 days than human kind in five years.

      I found this on this blog link http://www.rense.com/general94/onevol.htm. I am aware of the controversy surrounding prof. Ian Plimer and do not support him as such but then neither do I have much time for George Monbiot’s support for nuclear energy either.

      I will correct my post.

  3. Pingback: On silver iodide, weather modification and butterflies also known as the best weather money can buy | NORTHLAND NEW ZEALAND CHEMTRAILS WATCH

  4. “For example it appears that the eruption of the Chilean Volcano barfed more CO2 into the atmosphere to negate the entire attempt of man kind in the last five years so what are we going to do?”

    Where did you read that? The research and scientific comment I’ve seen on the subject differs significantly…

    “Emissions of CO2 by human activities are currently more than 130 times greater than the quantity emitted by volcanoes, amounting to about 27 billion tonnes per year.”
    http://volcanoes.usgs.gov/hazards/gas/index.php

    “…humans put out the same amount of carbon dioxide in three to five days that all of the volcanoes on Earth put out in one year. “Anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions dwarf global volcanic carbon dioxide emissions,” study researcher Terrance Gerlach, of the U.S. Geological Survey…”
    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43401085/ns/us_news-environment/

    (This takes into account the occasional super-eruption like Pinatubo or Puyehue-Cordon Caulle; see the research paper @ http://www.agu.org/pubs/pdf/2011EO240001.pdf for more info).

        • I hear ya and I am by no means decided on the issue. I live on a sustainable perma-culture block (Not that long and the food forest is in dire need of development still but you get my drift) and try to live sustainably but I want to be able to discuss all sites and widen the scope.

          Anyway. That wasn’t the most important issue I was trying to make. The JPG shows a very impressive list of weather modification companies. What’s your opinion about those?

          • Cloud seeding has been around for years.

            Cloud seeding operations generally use small planes (see the planes on the site you linked to), not the large jet airliners that are typically identified as laying ‘chemtrails’.

            They do their seeding directly into existing clouds, not in wide open skys at high altitude, as per normal ‘chemtrail’ behaviour.

            So, I’d say people who identify cloud-seeding operations as being responsible for the types of ‘chemtrails’ you’d typically see online are barking up the wrong tree.

        • The thing is James,

          There is a history of releasing particles that don’t belong in the atmosphere on a day to day base in order to manipulate weather behaviour that would not otherwise have occurred such as causing snow or rain in areas for commercial purposes such as snow fields. Events which will serve a few while perhaps other people might have the same or more need for some events to happen and in doing so these events are influencing geo-weather events.

          That my dear is the butterfly in the equation.

          I am not happy with anybody influencing natural events without knowing the outcome on a grander scale and I don’t like the idea that there is a group of people who is doing things benefiting the few to the detriment of many under the veil of secrecy.

          And who is to say that these same few are not developing systems which will be able to release large amounts of cheap as chip aluminium particles wtih big jumbo jets or are not already doing it. So if I may give you some advice you might want to get of your high horse of righteousness and get to study on the bigger picture. here.

          • Before man learned to make fire he was already influencing the environment. We all have an influence on the environment and I don’t think we can say with any amount of certainty (either way) what our ultimate influence will have on the environment.

            Removing the chemtrails from the equation would you agree that mans influence on the environment is significant, significant enough to potentially cause irreversible and potentially damaging change to the environment? From your original post I think you’d agree, for the most part.

            Man is reportedly pumping large quantities of gas including carbon dioxide into the atmosphere yet you seem to contest that this is causing climate change, correct?

            Excluding the chemtrails again lets say that the prolonged contrails left by planes are in fact the equivalent of cirrus clouds, i.e. man-made clouds. Do you think an increase in cloud level would potentially cause a change in the climate?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s