The poison is in the tail: Charlie Sheen and 911 or how to smear a 911 truth advocate

I don’t condone domestic violence and I’m sure Charlie Sheen is not the nicest of guys when under the influence of drugs and alcohol but why spend three pages on a simple case of two people getting drunk early in the morning and getting in fight. It happens all the time and some of them get arrested and end up in jail but most of them sober up and get on with life.

So why spend such an inordinate amount of attention on Charlie Sheens alleged attack on his wife especially when it turns out said wife does not want to cooperate with a police investigation because it turns out that she may have attacked Charlie Sheen instead?

Well, what makes it so interesting is the end of said article. In it they give a timeline about Charlie Sheen’s history of “disturbing and deviant” behaviour. Such as hiring prostitutes, getting drunk and coked out, having to enter rehab and going back on drugs and having tumultuous relations (all as far as I’m concerned personal issues and while a famous person might have to live with scrutiny not something in which C.S. deviates from say 60% of all male rich celebrities and as such not very interesting other than say on a gossip site) but then at the very end of said article out of the blue and having absolutely nothing to do with the subject of the article it states that Charlie Sheen has stated that the 911 attack looked like a controlled demolition and is a 911 truth advocate.

Heuh? He is but what does that have to do with the issue of matrimonial discord?

Not only that typing the title of the article which was first published in the Independent no less shows up 133.000 times and it appears that this article is published in newspapers all over the globe.

They must be getting mighty worried if the only response to a famous someone asking legitimate and unanswered questions about the events of 911 is to splatter his personal failures all over the mainstream media and connect them with his 911 truth activism.

About these ads

3 thoughts on “The poison is in the tail: Charlie Sheen and 911 or how to smear a 911 truth advocate

  1. Charlie Sheen has finally been poisoned by the mob who used to protect him but because he wanted to buy the car dealership that serviced his cars, the mob got upset and poisoned Charlie Sheen! It’s true. They will cover it up as always, money talks Bull walks!

  2. The plea likely doesn’t reflect whether his wife provoked and deserved the lesson.

    • There is absolutely no excuse for physical violence in a relationship. No matter how much one of the parties “provokes” the other. The only choice to make is to leave. I do not condone domestic violence and if Charlie Sheen is guilty he is guilty but hundreds of thousands of men are involved or have perpetrated domestic violence. What makes this case important is the fact that only weeks before Charlie was very vocal about his opinions about the events of 911 and this seems like a very effective way to shut him up.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s