‘Other than a Tehran-sponsored 9/11, it is hard to imagine what would change their minds.’ Brooking Institute.
In 1999 the Project for a new America with members such as Dick Cheney and Rumsfeld stated that unless a New “Pearl harbour occurred there was no much of a chance to attack Afghanistan and Iraq in order for America to gain control over the oil and resources of those countries.
Lucky for them 19 young Arabs flew two planes into the twin towers, collapsing three buildings into a pyroclastic flow within seconds and one plane into the Pentagon. Giving both Cheney and Rumsfeld the much wanted motivational boost to get the American population to support the wars that ensued.
Now the Brookings institute reckons that a nice little attack with a couple of Iranian planes would do the world for an attack on Iran.
I give it a month or so, they did promise us an October surprise after all.
In a recent policy paper published by the influential Brookings Institute, the authors propose almost anything to guarantee dominance of Persia by the new world order, including bribery, lying, cheating and mass murdering by an all-out military assault on Iran. The paper ‘Which path to Persia: Options for a New American Strategy toward Iran’ is just one of many recent and not so recent examples of the firm intent of the globalists to engage Iran militarily and acquire its natural resources in the same effort.
|Reminiscent of the Pearl Harbor-quote by raving neocons pre-9/11, the authors continue imagining how excellent it would be to have an Iranian-sponsored terror attack within the US to trigger war and march off toward Iran.|
The group of authors — a cozy little convergence of globalists — contemplate four separate options on ‘how to deal with Iran’ in the cold bureaucratic language that poses as scientific but really amounts to nothing more than the intelligent musings of a calculating psychopath. The first option, ‘Dissuading Tehran’ through diplomatic means is being discussed as something tried, tested and discarded. The second option, ‘Disarming Tehran’ covers several ways of rallying the ‘international community’ around the globalists’ intentions. In the third part, ‘Toppling Tehran’, the warmongering increases as the writers contemplate both covert and overt military action against the Islamic Republic of Iran. In the fourth and last section, ‘Deterring Tehran’ the option of ‘containment’ is elaborated upon. The proposed final strategy predictably involves all of the above mentioned options, in roughly the same order of appearance.